Wednesday, October 13, 2010

The Olive Tree Campaign Has Begun in Earnest

I just yesterday had to deal with that "poison chemical" story, and now the New Yoor Times weighs in with a big piece.

Before dealing with Kershner's hatchet job, let's see what the Int'l Red Cross thinks about the situation after last year's harvest:

25-11-2009 Interview

Harvesting olives in the West Bank: not as simple as it sounds

In the occupied West Bank, an estimated 10 million olive trees help some 100,000 families to make ends meet. For a number of years, the harvest has been hampered by restricted access. Tom Glue, who coordinates the ICRC's economic security programme in the territory, explains.

...What can you tell us about this year's harvest?

The harvest took place without major incident, which is an improvement on previous years. The Palestinian and Israeli authorities jointly coordinated Palestinian farmers' access to restricted areas around settlements and behind the West Bank barrier. The ICRC monitored the harvest but never had to take action as it did in previous years, for example when gates leading to olive groves remained shut.

It has to be said, though, that it was marred by the fact that thousands of trees were cut down or burned earlier in the year by settlers. In addition, Palestinian farmers in some areas were required for the first time to apply for permits to enter their lands behind the barrier. About 400 such applications were made for the southern part of the West Bank and fewer than half were approved. In most cases where applications were denied, the Israeli authorities argued that the farmers did not hold valid land-ownership documents.

I would suggest that "thousands" is not only an exaggeration but simply untrue. Nevertheless, the IRC is not concerned about "major" problems.

But the NYTimes is, or is making a major problem. They dealt with the area around Shiloh which has been in the center of this theme ("settlers destroy/burn/cut down/poison Arab olive trees" - and you rarely hear the reverse which happens often - "Arabs destroy Jewish olive tree saplings") for over 20 years now. Same Arabs even. And same old stories.

Here is the entire NYTimes' story

October 12, 2010
In West Bank, Peace Symbol Now Signifies Struggle
By ISABEL KERSHNER

TURMUS AYA, West Bank — Palestinians from villages like this one in the West Bank governorate of Ramallah still remember when the olive harvest was a joyous occasion, with whole families out for days in the fall sunshine, gathering the year’s crop and picnicking under the trees.

“We considered it like a wedding,” said Hussein Said Hussein Abu Aliya, 68.

But when Mr. Abu Aliya and his family from the neighboring village of Al-Mughayer — 36 of them in all, including grandchildren — drove out to their land this week in a snaking convoy of cars and pickup trucks with others from Turmus Aya, they found scores of their trees on the rocky slopes in various stages of decay, recently poisoned, they said, by Jewish settlers from an illegal Israeli outpost on top of the hill.

Branches drooped, the once lush, silver-green leaves were turning brown and the few olives still clinging on, which should have been plump and green or purple by harvest time, were shriveled and black. Dozens of trees nearby that Mr. Abu Aliya contended were similarly poisoned with chemicals last year stood like spindly skeletons, gray and completely bare.

Religious Jewish settlers consider the West Bank, which Israel captured from Jordan in the 1967 war, as their biblical birthright. For the 2.5 million Palestinians of the West Bank, it constitutes the heartland of a future independent state. While the Americans and Palestinians wrangle with the Israeli government over continued Israeli construction in the West Bank settlements — an issue that has stalled the embryonic peace talks — the competition for control of each acre of land here is being played out day by day.

And the olive tree, an ancient symbol of peace and plenty that has also long been a Palestinian emblem of steadfastness and commitment to the land, has increasingly become a symbol of local, almost intimate, struggle and strife.

Husniya al-Araj, 60, said she was born in a cave nearby, in an orchard of olive and almond trees. But when she reached her family lands this week, she cried out in shock. She pointed to a newly plowed field in front of her that she said was part of her family property, but that seemed to have been taken over by the settlers. It was now surrounded by a shiny new barbed-wire fence and planted with young vines.

Mahmud Ahmad Hazama, a relative who takes care of the Araj family property, said the barbed-wire fence went up in July. Folded in his wallet was a handwritten record of every change and every complaint Mr. Hazama had made to the Israeli Army and police since 1995.

“They ask me for documents,” he said. “We have all of them. The last thing they asked for was a topographic map.” He said he had received no answers so far.

Micky Rosenfeld, an Israeli police spokesman, said the police were aware of the problems. Every complaint is investigated, he says, but sometimes the culprits turn out not to be settlers, and sometimes there is not enough evidence to know. In some cases, the complaints do lead to arrests of settlers, he says.

Tamar Asraf, spokeswoman for the Binyamin Council, which represents the settlers in this region, said that for the most part the olive harvest passes peacefully, but that there were Palestinians and settlers who cause damage to one another. “We condemn them both,” she said.

Mr. Hazama’s relatives, like many other families, found their olive trees intact but empty of fruit. They argued that the olives must have been stolen by settlers, though they had no proof.

In other villages to the north, like Yanoun, Jit and Imatin, olives were stolen from hundreds of trees in the past few days, according to Rabbis for Human Rights, an Israeli organization that helps Palestinians farm lands in trouble spots year-round.

This was the first time the villagers of Turmus Aya and Al-Mughayer had been able to have access to their lands in six months. To do so, they need permission and protection from the Israeli Army, for a few days for plowing in springtime and a few days for picking in the fall. In the past, unprotected visits to the land ended with many stories of attacks by extremist settlers and burned cars.

This time, soldiers were guarding the villagers from the hilltop where the outpost, Adei Ad, sits. Three soldiers in khaki uniforms were sitting under one of Mr. Abu Aliya’s trees, almost camouflaged among its iridescent leaves while mountain gazelles sprang across the hills.

Adei Ad was established in the late 1990s on state and private Palestinian land, according to Israeli records. Though it was established without any official authorization, the Israeli Ministry of Housing and Construction provided financing for some of the infrastructure.

About 30 families live in trailers at Adei Ad, which has been scheduled for removal for seven years. The settlers have now put up an “eruv,” an elevated string on poles that encircles a community and allows observant Jews to carry objects within the proscribed area on the Sabbath. Mr. Abu Aliya has no idea what the string is for, but he says it runs right through his land.

This year, the harvest was less of a celebration, and more a show of perseverance. The Palestinian Authority governor of the Ramallah district, Laila Ghannam, joined the olive pickers and ate breakfast with the mayor of Turmus Aya under a tree.

“Our presence here is proof that this is our land and we will never give it up,” she said.

Members of a new unit from the authority’s Ministry of Agriculture were also out in the fields with notebooks, documenting the villagers’ complaints and counting the poisoned trees. They took samples of wilting branches to send to an Israeli laboratory for testing in the hope that the results could be used as future evidence in an Israeli court.

Mr. Abu Aliya, who has lost about half of his 300 olive trees, made a promise. “The moment the settlers leave,” he said, “I’ll make a big celebration. I’ll slaughter a buffalo.”

My comments, concise and even terse:

a) A buffalo? That I'd like to see.

b) if trees were poisoned, if, then that's stupid. the soil also would be tainted and noe trees could be grown there. why do that?

c) if she had spoken to me, I would have gotten her a reaction from Adei-Ad. As it is, there isn't balance in the story, especially and she herself writes in quite a circumspecy manner.

d) yes, land ownership is a problem. proof not only of ownership but of taxes paid, of evidence of tilling, etc. is hard to come by. the Arabs just took over and expect everyone to believe, that as conquerors and occupiers, they have more rights than the Jews to whom the land was guaranteed by international law in 1922.

e) olive trees are not only a "Palestinian emblem". Kershner could have started with the Bible and the uses of olives and olive oil for Jews for over 3000 years. that also is steadfatedness.

f) she doesn't mention the Achiyah Olive Press Factory. Too bad. They've planted over the past few years more than 5000 saplings, new, that were partially damaged by our Arab neighbors and are producing close to 10% of all Israel's olive oil. That story isn't fit for the NYTimes news department.

g) the land upon which Adei-Ad sits is the land that in 1982 was assigned to Shiloh, Greater Shiloh if you wish. The same for Givat Achiyah, Keidah, Esh-Kodesh and Shvut Rachel.

h) one more point: the villages of Turmos-Aya and Al-Mughyer have been a source of terror including murder, shootings, fire-bombs, rockthrowing, destruction of property, theft and more.  Just you should know.

Same basic story appears in the Washington Post. There, at least Joel Greenberg spoke to two reps from the local Jewish revenants although unlike Kershner, who only had Rabbis for Human Rights included, he also included a statement from Yesh Din.


(Thanks to SoccerDad for the referral)

Oh, and here's the NYTimes map at that story, minus any Jewish community:


P.S.

I might be updating this if I get more info.
_____________________

UPDATE

I forgot the fire that Arabs caused recently that destroyed some 60 dunams of agricultural land.

And I have been informed that over this past weekend, some 150 kilograms of olives were stolen, presumably by Arabs, who also destroyed many branches from an olive grove owned by a Jewish supporter of Shiloh from New York.


- - -

11 comments:

Unknown said...

Lets also expand on the mentioned families of Abu Alia and Na'asan. Both of these families have members that have been convicted of terror attacks. They actually used to feud between each other, at times committing murder.

Where as any violence and destruction is not the way to go, both of these families have committed many destructive acts and theft against all of the Jewish Communities in the region.

These are no simple Arab peasants.

Rabbi Arik Ascherman said...

1. I personally saw the holes drilled in the dying trees. It may take some time to prove that something was injected, but it is fairly clear.

2. Yesh Din caught Israelis coming from Adei Ad on October 3rd and stealing olives until the army chased them away (unfortunately nobody was caught) I have the pictures.
3. We are talking about families with their ownership papers in order. The fact that settlements claim land as within their jurisdiction doesn't make it so. According to Israeli governement statistics,some 40% of settlements are built on land Israeli recognizes as private Palestinian land. The actual numbers are higher because of all the ways that private land is not recognized as private land.
4. There are plenty of eye witnesses that saw Israelis setting the fires next to Khavat Gilad on Friday. Probably some those who openly admit that they instigated operation price tag to make the army think again before taking steps against settlements or outposts (The precipitating incident on Friday was an army operation at Khavat Gilad to confiscate goods of some sort) will proudly declare that Israelis did this.

YMedad said...

Is this the Rabbi Ascherman who was involved in the assault and battery case on Yaakov Sharvit about 9 mos. ago, when Arabs, feeling emboldened by his covering presence, managed to knock a former leukemia victim to the ground?

Some morality you practice.

Are "human rights" only for Arabs?

Their papers are in order? So why is the court case taking so long? Isn't true that they earlier invaded a plot the court told them they couldn't? Did you pay for the use of their tractor?

Rabbi Arik Ascherman said...

Yes, Yaakov Sharvit assaulted Palestinian farmers. I have the pictures and videoif you care to know the facts. I would hope that you would then apologize for Lashon HaRa. Rabbis For Human Rights beleives that every human being is created in God's Image. That is why we have been working for the last 9 years to help unemployed Israelis, running a center in Hadera since 2005 and very proud that we got the Knesset to defeat the Israeli Wisconisn Plan. I often feel that poor and unemployed Israelis are not of any interest to many because by helping them you don't score points in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I hope you are different. I was referring to the papers of the families next to Adei Ad, and you seemed to have switched the subject to the families from Kariyut owning lands next to Shilo. I can only tell you that we have helped the families work that same land for years, and the problems have cropped up since 2008. Not sure where everybody was with their claims before that. I have at least seen some of the Palestinian ownership papers, although I don't pretend to be an expert. I have asked to see ownership papers or any other proof, but nobody seemed to want to show anything, and the story about ownership changed several times. In the Shilo valley the Legal Advisor for the Occupied Territories has ruled that large tracks of land which settlers had taken over must be returned to their Palestinian owners. We work on many cases where settlers use force to prevent Palestinians from working their land and then claimed it as their own. If I am wrong in this case, I will publicly apologize. I doubt it. Back to the lands of Turmos Aya and Mreyer underneath Adei Ad, their papers are in order.

YMedad said...

Apologize? I saw them. You are not telling the truth in this: "Yaakov Sharvit assaulted Palestinian farmers". Yaakov was protecting a court order preventing Arabs from working a plot of land under judicial review. You paid for agricultural equipment to be brought and commit an offense. He was assaulted by at least two Arabs who shoved cameras in his face (did you pay for those, too?) and sought to interfere in his movement. In seeking to defend himself, he lifted an arm to ward off a violent attack and then was knocked to the ground while you stood by his blood. That land has been tilled for some 9 years by residents of Shiloh. If the court decides this or that way, it will be accepted. I doubt the Arabs will.

BTW, where are those pics of those trees with "holes" in them?

In 1982 or 83, in trying to claim land we were using as theirs, 8 Arab "landowners" were asked by an inspector to stand on "their" property. Two Arabs stood on the same choice property and began shouting and pushing each other and even throwing rocks at each other. We were laughing at their obvious put-on as if they really owned the land.

Arik, get used to it. Some of the people who are assisting, in addition to being terrorists and criminals and thieves, are laughing at you behind your back. Enjoy interfering with Jewish destiny.

YMedad said...

Oh, and Yonah wanted me to ask you where is the money he requested from you to aid really needy Arabs who are peaceful?

Rabbi Arik Ascherman said...

Today we accompanied farmers again after the IDF's Legal Advisor for the Territories acknowledged that this area is Palestinian owned land. Your security officer was polite and decent, but after I left a number of others arrived, presumably residents of Shilo. They tried again to block tractors, knocked a 70 year old volunteer of ours to the ground, etc. Although the Israeli High Court ruled in 2006 that the army is not allowed to close Palestinian owned land to the landowners to "protect" them from attack, the army did just that. They closed the area to Palestians to allow settlers to "calm down." Afterwards the police called to warn us that some Shilo residents are planning to harm me and the director of our OT operations. I hope that those Shilo residents with whom I may disagree but who don't condone this kind of behavior will accept this ruling and do your best to restrain your fellows.

Yonah was supposed to send/resend me information, but I don't recall receiving it.

YMedad said...

Before I forget, did you manage to help us find the Arabs who set fire to 60 dunams of Jewish agricultural land between Jaloud and Jourish, near Esh-Kodesh?

As for yesterday, I thank you for the report.

I understand that you were supposed to be banned today from the area and hopefully, the military governor will ban you in the future from all the area, similar to the expulsion orders Jewish kids received.

As far as I know, the Arabs have no proof of onwership nor proof of ever tending the area which has been tended for over 20 years by Moskowitz & Sharvit. And it is in an on-going judicial procedure which you should wait until it is finsihed before acting provocatively and indirectly causing violence.

Max said...

Mr. Asherman is due to return tomorrow. Unfortunately, he is not interested in Peace or the fact that the community of Shilo has enjoyed good relations with our neighbors, yes they have had their ups and downs, like anybody, but they enjoy a relative quiet that benefits all. They praise the people of Shilo as having helped them plenty in the past with medical and other emergencies where their own would not.

I found it interesting how Mr Asherman does not stick up for any Arab rights violated by the Palestinian Authority, imagine what might happen if he did, I believe being arrested would be the good scenario.

Mr Asherman, you cause violence where ever you go, if you truly believed in peace you would work to better the relations between the Arabs and the Jews of the region instead of causing more unneeded hatred.

It is understood by most that your intentions are not honorable, neither are your methods.

By the way, the majority of the Arabs from the area are not interested in you, and those that are admitted they only are because of the funds you distribute, like to the tractor drivers and so on.

The Arabs consider you a fool for them to use against the Jews. Sorry if you thought otherwise.

Rabbk Ark Ascherman said...

Send me the info about the alleged fire. I was just there, and didn't see anything. However, I don't know everything, and I will wait to see what you send. Please send me the ownership documents, as well as all the details you have about the alleged fire. I do know about the vineyard, apparently planted by settlers from Esh-Kodesh, on Palestinian land. Every time I am out there, those folks have extended a little further their red lines which they enforce against the rightful owners.

We don't need to be banned. If the Israeli security forces protect farmers as the law requires, we would be happy to be elsewhere. I would rather be studying Torah, and really would organize a group of our rabbis to study with you, if you were willing. It would be of value if I had to deal with the texts that inform your worldview, and you had to deal with mine. It would be risky.

While we are on the subject of texts: If I send you the Israeli ruling that this land is Palestinian private property, will you publicly apologize? I would like to believe that you are decent enough to do so. I can also send you the pictures of Palestinians and our volunteers working there freely. It wasn't twenty years ago. If Moskowitz and Sharvit have pictures from twenty years ago, we can make a great picture album.

Very interesting that Max knows my intentions and motivations better than I do. I also wish that I had all the money you think I have. As to your peaceful relations, everything is peaceful as long as the natives don't get uppity, and accept that from year to year more of their land has been usurped. And that sets up a real "peaceful" future for your children and mine.

As far as standing up for rights, I am glad to know that Max is standing up for Palestinian rights where I have failed. We apparently make a good team. I am sure that you also do more than we do for unemployed Israelis - Oops, I forgot that you can't score any points in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by helping unemployed Israelis. I guess we will have to continue to take care of them. Wonder if I would have any takers for Israelis being kicked out of public housing? Well, if the public housing was over the 1967 border....

YMedad said...

a) the Ausust fire is here

b) as for ownership papers, the League of Nations declared as international law that State Lands in the Palestine Mandate territory are to be used to facilitate close Jewish settlement so therefore your approach is wrongheaded. Given that the Arabs illegally conquered the area and illegally occupied it, and that there was never a local Arab state apparatus but this area was under the Ottoman Empire, and given the fact that the area around Shiloh was never surveyed or zoned or registered by the illegal occupation forces of the hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (whose ruler came from Saudi Arabia), you've got a very poor case.

c) sure, send me any document and it'll be published.